Evaluates caffeine removal using thermally modified bentonite adsorbent, indicating its economic viability.
Caffeine has been recognized as an emerging pollutant in aquatic ecosystems due to its persistence. This study evaluated the techno-economic viability of caffeine removal using thermally modified bentonite (Na–Bent–400) as an adsorbent. Caffeine removal was simulated under two operational schemes: Scenario 1 (S1: Adsorption–Disposal), where Na–Bent–400 is discarded following saturation, and Scenario 2 (S2: Regeneration–Reuse–Disposal), which integrates adsorbent regeneration to enable the reuse of Na–Bent–400 in a second adsorption before final disposal. Using the optimized model for caffeine removal (95.97% removal efficiency in batch operation: 2.26 g/L Na–Bent–400, 30 mg/L caffeine, and pH 8), the process was scaled up through process simulation in Aspen Plus (V14) for a treatment flow rate of 8 L/s (252,288 m3/year). Capital expenditure (CapEx) was estimated at USD 331,004 without adsorbent regeneration (S1) and USD 486,725 with regeneration (S2), showing a 47% increase due to auxiliary equipment and operational complexity; however, integrating adsorbent regeneration minimizes long-term operational expenditures by reducing raw material requirements and wastewater treatment costs. Estimated water treatment costs based on operational expenditures (OpEx) are USD 1.38/m3 for S1 and USD 0.74/m3 for S2. A sensitivity study found that caffeine concentrations above 30 mg/L have little effect on treatment costs. By evaluating these scenarios, this study demonstrates the preliminary techno-economic viability of thermally modified bentonite for treating caffeine-contaminated agroindustry effluents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quintero-Jaramillo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: