Case report illustrates evolving symptoms in a patient with anti-NMDAR encephalitis and MOG-IgG overlap, suggesting new assessment needs.
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is the most common autoimmune encephalitis. Neuroimaging findings are frequently normal or nonspecific, and predominant cortical involvement at disease onset is uncommon in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Overlap with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD) has been increasingly recognized; therefore, the value of individual reports lies in defining their longitudinal phenotypic evolution and diagnostic limitations. We report a 28-year-old woman with relapsing anti-NMDAR encephalitis followed for nearly seven years across three episodes (the index attack and two relapses). The initial presentation in 2018 was typical anti-NMDAR encephalitis, with positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) anti-NMDAR antibodies and complete clinical remission after the first episode. The 2022 relapse manifested as focal cortical encephalitis with progressive unilateral cortical swelling, sulcal enhancement, and seizures; MOG-IgG was not tested. In 2025, she developed recurrent headache, intracranial hypertension, and extensive unilateral cortical involvement, with later detected serum MOG-IgG at 1:32. CSF anti-NMDAR and MOG-IgG were not tested at this admission. The episode was therefore adjudicated as MOG-IgG-positive cortical encephalitis within a longitudinal anti-NMDAR/MOGAD overlap course rather than a proven simultaneous dual-antibody relapse. Oral methylprednisolone was followed by clinical and radiological improvement. Across nearly seven years, this case documents phenotypic evolution from CSF-confirmed anti-NMDAR encephalitis to recurrent unilateral cortical encephalitis and later serum MOG-IgG detection. A changing cortical phenotype should prompt renewed antibody assessment at each recurrence rather than reliance on the index antibody profile. Because MOG-IgG was not tested in earlier episodes and CSF anti-NMDAR was not tested in 2025, the timing and mechanistic contribution of each antibody cannot be determined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: