Cross-sectional study identifies treatment gaps in chronic hepatitis B care, highlighting demographic disparities.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) remains a leading cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) worldwide, yet treatment uptake is suboptimal even in high-resource settings. This pan-Canadian study aimed to quantify treatment gaps within the Canadian Hepatitis B Network (CanHepB) Registry, compare characteristics of treatment-eligible but untreated patients to those receiving therapy, and assess patient and specialist perspectives on barriers to treatment. METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective analysis of 1983 adults with CHB followed in 18 Canadian hepatitis B specialty clinics between January 2018 and November 2024. Treatment eligibility was determined using the 2018 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines. An anonymous survey captured patient-reported barriers and perspectives (n = 191), while a separate survey evaluated specialist perceptions (n = 54). RESULTS: Among 881 untreated patients, 46.4% (n = 409) were treatment eligible. Compared with the treatment group (n = 1087), the treatment-eligible but untreated patients were younger (median 47.3 vs. 54.5 years), more frequently female (54.2% vs. 39.7%), and more likely to be of Black/African/Caribbean origin (18.2% vs. 9.7%). They had a lower prevalence of cirrhosis (2.4% vs. 20.3%), HCC (0.7% vs. 9.3%), and hypertension (17.1% vs. 22.9%), but a higher prevalence of steatotic liver disease (36.4% vs. 24.6%) and dyslipidemia (14.7% vs. 10.8%). Among untreated respondents, concerns included side effects, the need for long-term therapy, and lack of curative options. Conversely, specialists identified cost as the primary barrier and side effects as the least concerning. CONCLUSION: This nationwide study reveals a significant treatment gap in CHB care, driven by demographic disparities and a mismatch between patient concerns and clinician perceptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ko et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: