Latent profile analysis identifies associations of bullying and psychological well-being with support structures among adolescents.
Introduction: This study identified joint profiles of bullying victimization and psychological well-being among adolescents in the PISA 2018 B-S-J-Z (China) sample and examined their associations with parental support, teacher support, and resilience. Methods: Latent profile analysis and multinomial logistic regression were conducted on data from 11,570 adolescents (52.1% male and 47.9% female; mean age = 15.8 years) participating in the Programme for International Student Assessment 2018. Results: A 7-class solution was identified, ranging from minimal victimization (high/low well-being) to severe victimization (low well-being). Parental support was associated with higher odds of being in Class 3 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.068, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.019–1.120; P = 0.007) and Class 4 (OR = 1.175, 95% CI: 1.124–1.227; P < 0.001), and lower odds of being in Class 6 (high victimization with low well-being; OR = 0.883, 95% CI: 0.803–0.970; P = 0.010). Teacher support was associated with higher odds of being in Class 3 (OR = 1.048, 95% CI: 1.004–1.094; P = 0.031) and Class 4 (OR = 1.175, 95% CI: 1.130–1.223; P < 0.001). Resilience was associated with higher odds of being in Class 4 (OR = 1.113, 95% CI: 1.071–1.157; P < 0.001) and lower odds of being in Class 2 (OR = 0.879, 95% CI: 0.839–0.920; P < 0.001) and Class 7 (severe victimization with low well-being; OR = 0.929, 95% CI: 0.873–0.988; P = 0.020). Conclusion: These findings reveal the heterogeneity in bullying victimization and psychological well-being among adolescents within China’s distinct socioeducational environment, offering evidence for tailored interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Song et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: