Randomized trial examines fault instability conditions in geomechanical contexts, suggesting new criteria for predicting slips.
The present study develops a dynamic extension of the geomechanical frameworkpreviously submitted by the author to Geosphere, in which a thick-beam Timoshenkorepresentation is coupled to Mohr–Coulomb effective stress and thermally activated ductilecreep to estimate the brittle–ductile transition (BDT) and effective seismogenic thickness. Theextension addresses a subsequent physical question: how can the computed seismogenicenvelope be related to the conditions required for unstable fault slip? We introduce a spatiallyand temporally variable critical nucleation length, Lc(x,z,t), based on rate-and-state friction,effective normal stress, shear rigidity, and critical slip distance. The formulation is written interms of Ψ = (b−a)σ′n, where σ′n = σn−Pf, so that independently inferred constraints on theproduct of frictional and effective-stress terms can be used without artificially separating porepressure from constitutive parameters. We further introduce a dimensionless connectivityratio R = Lconn/Lc, where Lconn is the spatially continuous length of a velocity-weakeningregion. The formulation is tested against Parkfield, Nankai, and Illapel. The resultingframework is not presented as a deterministic earthquake-timing predictor, but as a physicallytestable criterion for nucleation-scale instability within a thermomechanically constrainedseismogenic volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
JORGE MORA (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: