Retrospective controlled investigation assesses risk-based nursing model effects on self-management and complications in SCCC patients, suggesting improved outcomes.
Background Cervical small cell carcinoma (SCCC) represents an uncommon, highly aggressive malignancy with pronounced radiotherapy-related toxicity. The present research was conducted to assess the impact of a risk-based nursing (RBN) model on self-management efficacy, complications, and quality of life (QOL) in SCCC patients undergoing radical pelvic radiotherapy. Methods This single-center retrospective controlled investigation enrolled SCCC patients undergoing radical pelvic radiotherapy from January 2020 and June 2025. Patients were divided into a conventional nursing (CN) group and an RBN group according to the care model received. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and one month after radiotherapy completion, including self-management efficacy, medical coping modes, radiation-induced complications, anxiety and depression, QOL, and nutritional indicators. Results A total of 138 patients were analyzed (CN, n = 68; RBN, n = 70). After the nursing period, the RBN group had significantly greater self-efficacy ratings (positive attitude: 30.22 vs 28.36, P = 0.003; self-stress reduction: 26.55 vs 25.12, P = 0.008; self-determination: 13.12 vs 12.35, P = 0.002). RBN also reduced avoidance and surrender coping, and increased confrontation (P < 0.05). The incidences of radiation proctitis (5.71% vs 16.18%, P = 0.048) and grade ≥2 skin reactions (7.14% vs 20.59%, P = 0.022) were lower in RBN. Anxiety and depression scores were significantly decreased (P = 0.004 and P = 0.027). Physical function (71.35 vs 68.42, P = 0.011) and nutritional indices (serum albumin: 38.03 vs 36.55 g/L, P = 0.022; hemoglobin: 115.42 vs 111.35 g/L, P = 0.020) improved. Conclusion Risk-based nursing is associated with improved self-management efficacy, reduced radiation proctitis and skin toxicity, alleviated psychological distress, and preserved nutritional status in SCCC patients undergoing radiotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Feng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: