Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Atmospheric compositions of giant exoplanets can retain information about their formation environments, as volatile species condense at different temperatures in protoplanetary discs. We investigated whether the atmospheric compositions of hot Jupiters can constrain their formation locations. We performed planet formation simulations using the ChemComp code, including pebble drift, pebble and gas accretion, planet migration, stellar abundances, and two additional chemical processes: thermal decomposition of refractory organics and CO/CO 2 trapping in water ice. We applied this framework to nine observed hot Jupiter systems and compared the resulting atmospheric metallicities (C/H and O/H) with observational constraints. We found that the observed atmospheric abundances of the nine hot Jupiter systems can be reproduced by planets forming at different locations relative to the H 2 O and CO 2 snowlines. Our results suggest that at least six of the nine systems are consistent with formation beyond the H 2 O snowline. Combined with the observed orbital separations, eccentricities, and spin–orbit obliquities, these inferred formation locations indicate that many systems likely experienced dynamical scattering followed by tidal evolution. Atmospheric abundances, in combination with detailed orbital parameters, can provide a powerful diagnostic of the formation and migration histories of hot Jupiter systems, opening up avenues to understand the origin of giant planets in general.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: