⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

June 18, 2013BMJOpen Access

IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Design

Review

Authors

PEPatrick ErginaMcGill University Health Centre ABAlan BarkunUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 PMPeter McCullochUniversity of Stirling

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May guide prospective observational data collection in surgical innovation; leaves open definitive randomized evaluation per IDEAL.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Ergina et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7d83326bb6a3a5bcac776a https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3011

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Adoption of new surgical technology2006 · 193 citations
2An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses2011 · 379 citations
3Case-mix adjustment in non-randomised observational evaluations: the constant risk fallacy2007 · 109 citations