Key result
Low impulse-high control profile linked to superior self-management scores in stroke survivors.
Cross-Sectional (n=519)
No
Identifying self-control profiles in stroke survivors can help target interventions to improve self-management, particularly for those with ambivalent or low-control psychologies.
PURPOSE: To identify and explore the latent categories of self-control and clarify the relationship between self-control and self-management of stroke survivors under different categories. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted using a general information questionnaire, the Chinese version of the Dual-Mode Self-Control Scale, and the Stroke Self-Management Scale to measure sociodemographic data, self-control, and self-management. The questionnaires were administered face-to-face, and a convenience sampling method was used to collect the data. A total of 519 stroke survivors from a tertiary hospital in Henan Province, China, were included. Data were analyzed using latent profile analysis and the Kruskal-Wallis H test. RESULTS: The four-profile model was the most suitable. It was named as follows: low impulse-high control group (25.0%), low impulse-low control group (39.7%), high impulse-high control group (24.7%), and high impulse-low control group (10.6%). The self-management scores of the low impulse and high control group were significantly higher than those of the other three groups. CONCLUSION: Stroke survivors demonstrate moderate levels of self-control. In particular, patients with ambivalent self-control psychologies are noteworthy as they require strategies to address this contradictory psychological situation. Healthcare providers should consider the unique self-control characteristics of stroke survivors to assist them in enhancing their self-control abilities. Future research should use more objective assessment methods to examine long-term changes in self-control among stroke survivors and their relationships with self-management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Stroke (n=519). Self-control profiles vs. Different self-control profiles was evaluated on Self-management scores. Stroke survivors in the low impulse-high control group (25.0%) had significantly higher self-management scores than those in the other three self-control profiles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: