Why the study?
Little is known about continuous macrocirculatory adaptations and microcirculatory mechanisms under microgravity.
Does microgravity alter macrocirculation and microcirculation in healthy volunteers compared to normal gravity?
Does microgravity alter macrocirculation and microcirculation in healthy volunteers compared to normal gravity?
Acute weightlessness during parabolic flights induces profound macrocirculatory changes in seated but not supine postures, while microcirculation remains stable.
Posture-specific macrocirculatory shifts in acute weightlessness merit monitoring in spaceflight; leaves open long-term gravitational effects on circulation.
BACKGROUND: Profound knowledge about cardiovascular physiology in the setting of microgravity can help in the course of preparations for human space missions. So far, influences of microgravity on the cardiovascular system have been demonstrated, particularly pertaining to venous fluid shifts. Yet, little is known about the mechanisms of these adaptations on continuous macrocirculatory level and regarding the microcirculation. METHODS: Twelve healthy volunteers were subjected to alternating microgravity and hypergravity in the course of parabolic flight maneuvers. Under these conditions, as well as in normal gravity, the sublingual microcirculation was assessed by intravital sidestream dark field microscopy. Furthermore, hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate, blood pressure, and cardiac output were recorded by beat-to-beat analysis. In these settings, data acquisition was performed in seated and in supine postures. RESULTS: = 0.0002] increased in weightlessness compared to normal gravitation phases in the seated but not in the supine posture. However, microcirculation represented by perfused proportion of vessels and by total vessel density was unaffected in acute weightlessness. CONCLUSION: Profound changes of the macrocirculation were found in seated postures, but not in supine postures. However, microcirculation remained stable in all postures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bimpong‐Buta et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: