Key result
Type 1 diabetes status did not significantly affect epicardial adipose tissue thickness among youth with overweight or obesity (2.10 vs. 1.90 mm, p=0.19).
Why the study?
Obesity prevalence has increased in children with type 1 diabetes and may confer additional cardiovascular disease risk, but the impact on epicardial adipose tissue thickness in the setting of overweight or obesity was unclear.
Does type 1 diabetes increase epicardial adipose tissue thickness in youth with overweight/obesity compared to those without type 1 diabetes?
Observational (n=72)
Does type 1 diabetes increase epicardial adipose tissue thickness in youth with overweight/obesity compared to those without type 1 diabetes?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.1% vs 1.9%
p-value: p=0.19
In youth with overweight or obesity, epicardial adipose tissue thickness is driven primarily by adiposity and insulin resistance rather than the presence of type 1 diabetes.
EAT thickness in overweight youth appears driven by adiposity rather than T1D; leaves open diabetes-specific effects in leaner cohorts.
Objectives Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness, a novel marker of cardiovascular disease (CVD), is increased in children with a healthy weight and type 1 diabetes (T1D). The prevalence of obesity has increased in children with T1D and may confer additional CVD risk. The purpose of this study was to examine EAT thickness in youth with and without T1D in the setting of overweight/obesity. Methods Youth with overweight/obesity and T1D (n=38) or without T1D (n=34) between the ages of 6–18 years were included in this study. Echocardiogram using spectral and color flow Doppler was used to measure EAT and cardiac function. Waist circumference, blood pressure, and HbA 1c , were used to calculate estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR) to estimate insulin resistance in children with T1D. Results EAT thickness was not significantly different in youth with T1D compared to controls (2.10 ± 0.67 mm vs. 1.90 ± 0.59 mm, p=0.19). When groups were combined, EAT significantly correlated with age (r=0.449, p≤0.001), BMI (r=0.538, p≤0.001), waist circumference (r=0.552, p≤0.001), systolic BP (r=0.247, p=0.036), myocardial performance index (r=−0.287, p=0.015), ejection fraction (r=−0.442, p≤0.001), and cardiac output index (r=−0.306, p=0.009). In the group with T1D, diastolic BP (r=0.39, p=0.02) and eGDR (r=−0.48, p=0.002) correlated with EAT. Conclusions EAT was associated with measures of adiposity and insulin resistance but does not differ by diabetes status among youth with overweight/obesity. These findings suggest that adiposity rather than glycemia is the main driver of EAT thickness among youth with T1D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cielonko et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Overweight/obesity and type 1 diabetes (n=72). Type 1 diabetes vs. Youth without type 1 diabetes was evaluated on Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) thickness (p=0.19). Type 1 diabetes status did not significantly affect epicardial adipose tissue thickness among youth with overweight or obesity (2.10 vs. 1.90 mm, p=0.19).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: