Context/ research question: Chest compression quality plays a major role in patient outcomes after cardiac arrest. The Japanese cardiopulmonary resuscitation (JRC) guidelines 2015 indicates that chest compression depth should be approximately 5 cm but not more than 6 cm. However, the upper limit of chest compression depth might be a barrier to the delivery of adequate chest compressions by laypersons. We hypothesized that laypersons may be able to perform chest compressions (approximately 5 cm) as per the JRC guidelines, without setting an upper limit for chest compression depth. Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to either the “unlimited group” (no recommendation regarding the upper limit of compression depth) or the “limited group” (“push to approximately 5 cm, don’t push over 6 cm”) and stratified according to sex using permuted blocks. All participants completed a 15-min chest compression training session, and their compression skills were individually evaluated immediately and at 6 months after the training using the Laerdal® PC SkillReporting System at Kyoto University. The primary outcome was the median compression depth during the 2-min test period 6 months after the training. Results: Seventy-two participants were enrolled; 33 participants in each group completed the study. The unlimited group performed significantly deeper chest compressions (>60 mm) immediately after the training than the limited group; however, there was no significant difference 6 months after training. Although not significant, the number of compressions with the recommended depth (49–59 mm) was higher in the limited group. Importance: These results suggest that simplified instructions that do not mention the upper limit of compression depth may help people perform deeper chest compressions; however, there are concerns about the risks associated with too deep compressions. Considering the situation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Japan, studies focusing on compression depths in another aged people should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sano et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: