Key result
During simulated orthostasis, sedentary middle-age men exhibited a significant FVR-MSNA relationship (r=0.44, P<0.001) that was not evident in age-matched fit men (r=0.19, P=0.10).
Why the study?
Does physical fitness alter the reflex sympathetic neurovascular transduction during simulated orthostasis in middle-age men?
Cross-Sectional (n=20)
Does physical fitness alter the reflex sympathetic neurovascular transduction during simulated orthostasis in middle-age men?
Middle-aged sedentary men exhibit a significant relationship between forearm vascular resistance and muscle sympathetic nerve activity during simulated orthostasis that is absent in age-matched fit men, suggesting fitness alters neurovascular coupling.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fitness-related differences in neurovascular coupling during orthostasis should not yet change practice; leaves open whether training modifies reflex sympathetic control.
PURPOSE: Muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) is increased in older endurance-trained men, yet the reflex sympathetic forearm vasoconstrictor response to graded lower body negative pressure (LBNP) diminishes with age. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of aerobic exercise capacity on this altered neurovascular coupling. We hypothesized that during graded LBNP, the forearm vascular resistance (FVR)-MSNA relationship would be steeper in sedentary versus fit men. METHODS: We therefore studied 20 healthy middle-age men (age = 52 ± 2 yr, mean ± SE), 10 physically active (FIT) and 10 sedentary (SED) (129% ± 4% vs 85% ± 3% of predicted peak oxygen uptake) during 4 min each of LBNP at -5, -10, -20, and -40 mm Hg, applied in a random order. We determined HR, plasma norepinephrine, and MSNA (microneurography) and derived FVR from blood pressure and forearm blood flow (plethysmography). The FVR-MSNA relationship was determined by linear regression in each group separately, and groups were compared using multiple linear regression. RESULTS: MSNA burst frequency and FVR at rest and during LBNP (P < 0.003) were similar in the two groups, whereas HR was significantly lower (P < 0.002) both at rest and during LBNP in FIT men (P < 0.05). FVR during LBNP correlated positively with MSNA in the SED group (r = 0.44, P < 0.001) but not in the FIT group (r = 0.19, P = 0.10). Multiple linear regression confirmed that both MSNA (P < 0.001) and fitness level (P = 0.04) contribute to the forearm vascular response. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, during simulated orthostasis, middle-age SED men exhibit a significant FVR-MSNA relationship, which is not evident in age-matched FIT men. This alteration in neurovascular coupling may potentially affect cardiovascular risk in middle-age men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Notarius et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=20). Physical fitness (aerobic exercise capacity) vs. Sedentary lifestyle was evaluated on Forearm vascular resistance (FVR)-MSNA relationship during graded lower body negative pressure (p=0.04). During simulated orthostasis, sedentary middle-age men exhibited a significant FVR-MSNA relationship (r=0.44, P<0.001) that was not evident in age-matched fit men (r=0.19, P=0.10).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: