Key result
Comprehensive therapy based on traditional Chinese medicine patterns combined with conventional Western medicine significantly reduced the average frequency of acute exacerbations (1.01 vs 1.95 times, P<0.001) compared to Western medicine alone in patients with stable COPD.
Why the study?
Does comprehensive therapy based on traditional Chinese medicine patterns improve clinical outcomes and reduce exacerbations in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
RCT (n=352)
Open-label
Stratified and block randomization
Yes
Does comprehensive therapy based on traditional Chinese medicine patterns improve clinical outcomes and reduce exacerbations in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.01% vs 1.95%
p-value: p=<0.001
Comprehensive traditional Chinese medicine therapy added to conventional Western medicine improves symptoms, lung function, and reduces exacerbations in patients with stable COPD.
Supports adjunctive TCM pattern therapy in stable COPD regimens; extends RCT evidence for integrative approaches in chronic lung disease.
BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has been used to treat chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for many years. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the comprehensive therapy based on the three common TCM patterns in stable COPD patients. METHODS: A four-center, open-label randomized controlled method was conducted. A total of 352 patients were divided into the trial group (n = 176, treated with conventional Western medicine and Bu-Fei Jian-Pi granules, Bu-Fei Yi-Shen granules, and Yi-Qi Zi-Shen granules based on the TCM patterns respectively) and the control group (n = 176, treated with conventional Western medicine). The frequency and duration of acute exacerbation, lung function, clinical symptoms, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), dyspnea scale and quality of life were observed during a 6-month treatment period and at a further 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 306 patients completed the study fully. The full analysis set (FAS) population was 350 and the per-protocol analysis set (PPS) population was 306. After the 6-month treatment and 12-month follow-up, there were significant differences between the trial and control group in the following: frequency of acute exacerbation (FAS: P = 0.000; PPS: P = 0.000); duration of acute exacerbation (FAS: P = 0.000; PPS: P = 0.001); FEV1 (FAS: P = 0.007; PPS: P = 0.008); symptoms (FAS: P = 0.001; PPS: P = 0.001); 6MWD (FAS: P = 0.045; PPS: P = 0.042); dyspnea scale (FAS: P = 0.002; PPS: P = 0.004); and physical domain (FAS: P = 0.000; PPS: P = 0.000), psychological domain (FAS: P = 0.008; PPS: P = 0.011), social domain (FAS: P = 0.001; PPS: P = 0.000) and environment domain (FAS: P = 0.015; PPS: P = 0.009) of the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire. There were no differences between the trial and control group in FVC, FEV1% and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the TCM patterns, Bu-Fei Jian-Pi granules, Bu-Fei Yi-Shen granules and Yi-Qi Zi-Shen granules have beneficial effects on measured outcomes in stable COPD patients over the 6-month treatment and 12-month follow-up, with no relevant between-group differences in adverse events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Register Center, ChiCTR-TRC-11001406.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in Stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (n=352). Comprehensive therapy based on traditional Chinese medicine patterns (Bu-Fei Jian-Pi, Bu-Fei Yi-Shen, and Yi-Qi Zi-Shen granules) plus conventional Western medicine vs. Conventional Western medicine was evaluated on Average frequency of acute exacerbation of COPD (p=<0.001). Comprehensive therapy based on traditional Chinese medicine patterns combined with conventional Western medicine significantly reduced the average frequency of acute exacerbations (1.01 vs 1.95 times, P<0.001) compared to Western medicine alone in patients with stable COPD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: