Key result
Higher clinical severity at presentation (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.38-4.49), aneurysm size, and vasospasm were significantly associated with an increased risk of cerebral infarction following aSAH.
Why the study?
Evidence about predictors of poor outcomes such as cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage has not been fully elucidated.
What are the predictors of cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Meta-Analysis
What are the predictors of cerebral infarction after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage?
Odds Ratio: 2.49 (95% CI 1.38–4.49)
p-value: p=0.0003
Clinical severity at presentation, vasospasm, and aneurysm size are significant predictors of cerebral infarction following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
INTRODUCTION: Evidence about predictors of poor outcomes such as cerebral infarction (CI) after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) has not been fully elucidated.EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies with adults with aSAH considering RCT and non-RCT, prospective, and retrospective cohort studies describing clinical, imaging as well as angiographic studies in patients with aSAH.EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: After reviewing the complete text, 11 studies were considered eligible, out of which four were ruled out. Degree of clinical severity was the most predictive factor with a higher degree at the presentation on different severity scales being associated with a statistically significant increasing the risk of suffering a CI following aSAH (OR 2.49 [95% CI 1.38-4.49] P=0.0003). Aneurysm size increased the risk of CI (OR 1.49 [95% CI 1.20-1.85] P=0.0003; I2=4%). In six studies analyzed, it was found that an important factor for the subsequent development of CI is vasospasm (OR 7.62 [2.19, 26.54], P=0.0001).CONCLUSIONS: The development of vasospasm is a risk factor for CI development after aSAH. In our review, three factors were associated with an increased risk of CI: clinical severity at presentation, vasospasm, and aneurysm size. The major limitation of this meta-analysis is that included studies were conducted retrospectively or were post hoc analyses of a prospective trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Florez-Perdomo et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Clinical severity at presentation vs. Lower clinical severity was evaluated on Cerebral infarction (CI) (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.38-4.49, p=0.0003). Higher clinical severity at presentation (OR 2.49; 95% CI 1.38-4.49), aneurysm size, and vasospasm were significantly associated with an increased risk of cerebral infarction following aSAH.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: