Key result
Greater right-hemisphere periventricular WMH burden is linked to poorer therapy-related naming improvements.
Why the study?
Does right-hemisphere white matter hyperintensity load better predict aphasia severity and treatment outcomes compared to whole-brain ratings in patients with chronic poststroke aphasia?
Observational (n=95)
Does right-hemisphere white matter hyperintensity load better predict aphasia severity and treatment outcomes compared to whole-brain ratings in patients with chronic poststroke aphasia?
Effect estimate: r = -0.226
p-value: p=0.044
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Measuring white matter hyperintensity in the contralateral (right) hemisphere provides a more accurate estimation of brain health and prediction of therapy-related neuroplasticity in chronic poststroke aphasia.
Busby et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Chronic aphasia post-stroke (n=95). White matter hyperintensity (WMH) severity was evaluated on Therapy-related naming improvements (r = -0.226, p=0.044). Right-hemisphere periventricular white matter hyperintensity severity was significantly associated with therapy-related naming improvements (r = -0.226, P = 0.044).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: