Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both in the United States and in Europe, antitrust authorities prohibit merger not only if the merged entity, in and of itself, is no longer sufficiently controlled by competition, but also if, post merger, the market structure has changed such that “tacit collusion” or “coordinated effects” become disturbingly more likely. It seems that antitrust neglects the fact that for more than 50 years, economists have been doing experiments on this very question. Almost any conceivable determinant of higher or lower collusion has been tested. This article standardizes the evidence by way of a meta‐study, and relates experimental findings as closely as possible to antitrust doctrine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christoph Engel (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: