Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-cell experiments in yeast reveal two distinct heritable phenotypes—‘‘arresters’’ and ‘‘recoverers’’—when a clonal population experiences a negative shift in its growth environment. Recoverers exhibit a variable yet finite lag before resuming growth in the new environment, whereas arresters remain in a nongrowing, arrested state until more favorable conditions return. Although the diversification of individual cells into arresters and recoverers is a robust phenomenon, it remains unclear whether this coexistence constitutes an evolutionarily stable strategy. Here, we demonstrate that a heterogeneous strategy composed of both arrester and recoverer phenotypes maximizes long-term population fitness across a broad spectrum of growth-lag trade-offs. Our analysis employs a dynamic programming framework to identify the fitness-maximizing distribution of phenotypes for populations that stochastically switch between preferred and nonpreferred environments. We propose a minimal model incorporating metabolism, growth, and enzyme allocation to explain the physiological origin of a power-law growth-lag trade-off that favors phenotypic heterogeneity. The theory predicts a nontrivial relationship between the fraction of recoverers and their lag time, which aligns with existing data from wild yeast strains, evolved isolates, and variations in preshift growth conditions. This relationship suggests an evolutionary ‘‘rheostat’’-like mechanism that enables populations to rapidly adapt to changing environmental conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2026 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: