Key result
Internet-based warfarin management significantly increased the time in therapeutic range (mean 0.53 vs 0.46; OR 1.07) compared to conventional management in patients after mechanical heart valve replacement.
Why the study?
Whether internet-based warfarin management reduces complications and improves quality of life in patients requiring lifelong warfarin therapy after mechanical heart valve replacement remained unknown.
Does internet-based warfarin management improve time in therapeutic range and reduce bleeding and embolic events in patients requiring long-term anticoagulation after mechanical heart valve replacement?
RCT (n=721)
Open-label
Central stratified randomization
Yes
Does internet-based warfarin management improve time in therapeutic range and reduce bleeding and embolic events in patients requiring long-term anticoagulation after mechanical heart valve replacement?
Odds Ratio: 1.07 (95% CI 1.05–1.09)
Absolute Event Rate: 0.53% vs 0.46%
p-value: p=<.001
Internet-based warfarin management significantly improves the time in therapeutic range and reduces bleeding and embolic complications compared to conventional management in patients after mechanical heart valve replacement.
Supports digital warfarin management post-valve replacement; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Mechanical heart valve replacement (MHVR) is an effective method for the treatment of severe heart valve disease; however, it subjects patient to lifelong warfarin therapy after MHVR with the attendant risk of bleeding and thrombosis. Whether internet-based warfarin management reduces complications and improves patient quality of life remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects of internet-based warfarin management and the conventional approach in patients who received MHVR in order to provide evidence regarding alternative strategies for long-term anticoagulation. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial with a 1-year follow-up. Patients who needed long-term warfarin anticoagulation after MHVR were enrolled and then randomly divided into conventional and internet-based management groups. The percentage of time in the therapeutic range (TTR) was used as the primary outcome, while bleeding, thrombosis, and other events were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 721 patients were enrolled. The baseline characteristics did not reach statistical differences between the 2 groups, suggesting the random assignment was successful. As a result, the internet-based group showed a significantly higher TTR (mean 0.53, SD 0.24 vs mean 0.46, SD 0.21; P<.001) and fraction of time in the therapeutic range (mean 0.48, SD 0.22 vs mean 0.42, SD 0.19; P<.001) than did those in the conventional group. Furthermore, as expected, the anticoagulation complications, including the bleeding and embolic events had a lower frequency in the internet-based group than in the conventional group (6.94% vs 12.74%; P=.01). Logistic regression showed that internet-based management increased the TTR by 7% (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.09; P<.001) and reduced the bleeding and embolic risk by 6% (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.96; P=.01). Moreover, low TTR was found to be a risk factor for bleeding and embolic events (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.91; P=.005). CONCLUSIONS: The internet-based warfarin management is superior to the conventional method, as it can reduce the anticoagulation complications in patients who receive long-term warfarin anticoagulation after MHVR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800016204; http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=27518. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032949.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Mechanical heart valve replacement requiring long-term warfarin anticoagulation (n=721). Internet-based warfarin management vs. Conventional management was evaluated on Time in the therapeutic range (TTR) (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.09, p=<.001). Internet-based warfarin management significantly increased the time in therapeutic range (mean 0.53 vs 0.46; OR 1.07) compared to conventional management in patients after mechanical heart valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: