Why the study?
Does simultaneous brachial and ankle blood pressure measurement predict the extent of myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Does simultaneous brachial and ankle blood pressure measurement predict the extent of myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected coronary artery disease?
Ankle-brachial index <1 helps identify high-risk patients with multiple risk factors who have >10% ischemic myocardium on perfusion imaging.
ABI <1 was associated with greater ischemia in high-risk patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Although the simultaneous measurement of brachial and ankle blood pressure is a simple method of evaluating atherosclerosis, its diagnostic value for coronary artery disease (CAD) is undetermined. METHODS AND RESULTS: To evaluate the diagnostic value of ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI) and brachial-to-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), 334 consecutive patients with suspected CAD were evaluated. Patients with a previous myocardial infarction or coronary intervention were not included. The magnitude of myocardial ischemia was evaluated by myocardial perfusion imaging. Using a 20-segment model, the percent of ischemic segments to total segments was expressed as %myocardium ischemic. In patients with < or =1, 2 and > or =3 coronary risk factors, %myocardium ischemic was 2.7+/-0.4, 4.0+/-0.5, 7.9+/-0.8%, respectively (p<0.0001 for trend). Performing ABI with a cutoff of 1, the %myocardium ischemic was similar in patients with < or =1 or 2 risk factors. In patients with > or =3 coronary risk factors, however, an ABI <1 reflected greater %myocardium ischemic than an ABI > or =1 (10.1+/-1.3, 6.6+/-1.0%; p=0.03). No such additional value was observed with baPWV. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of simultaneous brachial and ankle blood pressure measurements will help further stratify patients with multiple risk factors. Although this approach is simple, it facilitates the identification of high-risk patients who require aggressive treatment because >10% myocardium ischemic is regarded as a scintigraphic indicator for coronary revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Igarashi et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: