Key result
In a retrospective evaluation of 460 patients with atrial fibrillation, 46.3% received inappropriate oral anticoagulant prescriptions, most commonly due to inappropriate dosing.
Why the study?
Selecting the appropriate OAC based on patient characteristics is challenging, prompting an evaluation of discrepancies between clinician prescriptions and recommended guidelines in patients with AF.
Cross-Sectional (n=460)
No
A high proportion (46.3%) of patients with atrial fibrillation received inappropriate oral anticoagulant prescriptions in clinical practice, most commonly due to inappropriate underdosing of direct oral anticoagulants.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing, and effective anticoagulation therapy can prevent adverse events. Selecting the appropriate OAC based on patient characteristics has become a challenge. Interventions are going to be a potential area of focus. OBJECTIVES: To explore the discrepancies between clinician prescriptions and recommended guidelines of oral anticoagulants (OACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and to provide direction for improving anticoagulation strategies for treating patients with AF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from the electronic medical record system of Fuwai Yunnan Cardiovascular Hospital between July 2019 and January 2020. The suitability of prescribed OACs for patients with AF was assessed according to the Rules for Avoiding Prescription Inappropriateness, the prescribed medicine label, and any relevant antithrombotic guidelines for treating patients with AF. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 53.7% received an appropriate prescription and 46.3% received an inappropriate prescription. Of the patients who received inappropriate prescriptions, 15.4% were prescribed without the presenting appropriate indicators, 1.3% were prescribed inappropriate drug selection, and 29.6% were prescribed inappropriate drug doses. For patients prescribed without providing appropriate indicators, 2.2% had no indication for medication and 13.3% had an indication for medication, but not a specific OAC. For patients with inappropriate drug selection, 1, 5 patients were on rivaroxaban, dabigatran respectively. The distribution of NOAC doses was as follows: dabigatran standard dose (45.2%), the low dose (54.8%). Rivaroxaban standard dose (58.9%), low dose (36.8%), high dose (4.3%). A total of 44 patients (9.6%) experienced bleeding events, 12 patients (2.6%) experienced embolic events, and 7 patients experienced other adverse events after dosing. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, it is common for patients with AF to receive inappropriate prescriptions of OACs. Therefore there is a need to enhance anticoagulation management in patients with AF to improve the appropriate use of OACs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=460). Oral anticoagulants (OACs) was evaluated on Appropriateness of oral anticoagulant prescriptions. In a retrospective evaluation of 460 patients with atrial fibrillation, 46.3% received inappropriate oral anticoagulant prescriptions, most commonly due to inappropriate dosing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: