Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Field study shows reduced muscle activity but declining user acceptance in logistics workers using passive shoulder exoskeletons, questioning workplace suitability.
Occupational exoskeletons contribute to diminish the biomechanical load during manual work. However, familiarization to the use of exoskeletons is rarely considered, which may lead to failure of acceptance and implementation. In this study, ten logistic workers underwent a 5-week progressive familiarization to a passive shoulder exoskeleton, while ten workers acted as controls. Tests pre and post the familiarization applied measurements of muscle activity and kinematics of back, neck, and shoulder, perceived effort, and usability-ratings of the exoskeleton. Exoskeleton use resulted in lower muscle activity of anterior deltoid (13-39%) and upper trapezius (16-60%) and reduced perceived effort. Additionally, it induced an offset in shoulder flexion and abduction during resting position (8-10°). No conclusions on familiarization could be drawn due to low adherence to the protocol. However, the emotions of the workers towards using the exoskeleton decreased making it questionable whether the shoulder exoskeleton is suitable for use in the logistics sector.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jakobsen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: