Key result
Transvenous mechanical right-left controlled-rotation lead extraction achieved a 95% procedural success rate with zero superior vena cava injuries and 0% procedure-related mortality.
Why the study?
Transvenous CIED lead extraction carries risk of superior vena cava injury, prompting evaluation of a contemporary experience with mechanical right-left rotational extraction by cardiac surgeons in the OR.
Does a transvenous mechanical right-left controlled-rotation system provide safe and effective CIED lead extraction in adult patients?
Observational (n=104)
No
Does a transvenous mechanical right-left controlled-rotation system provide safe and effective CIED lead extraction in adult patients?
Mechanical, controlled-rotation transvenous lead extraction performed by cardiac surgeons in the operating room is highly successful (95%) and avoids superior vena cava injury.
Supports surgeon-led mechanical extraction in OR; leaves open randomized comparisons to other techniques.
Background: Transvenous cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction (TLE) is susceptible to superior vena cava (SVC) injury and can be performed in the operating room (OR) or electrophysiology lab via a mechanical device or laser-powered extraction. This study reflects a contemporary experience of mechanical right-left rotational extraction by cardiac surgeons in the OR. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center review of adult (age ≥18 years) TLE cases performed by cardiac surgeons between 2019 and 2021. Leads were extracted via a transvenous mechanical right-left controlled-rotation system in the OR under general anesthesia with transesophageal echocardiographic guidance. Procedural success was defined as complete extraction of all leads without major complications, based on the Heart Rhythm Society's 2017 guidelines. Results: A total of 210 leads were extracted from 104 patients, including 72 males (69%). The mean patient age was 63.8 ± 16.7 years, and 26 patients (25%) had undergone prior sternotomy. The most common indication for CIED extraction was infection (69%; n = 72). Removed CIEDs included single-chamber defibrillators (46%; n = 48), pacemakers (33%; n = 34), and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (21%; n = 22). The mean age of the oldest extracted lead by patient was 9.79 ± 7.25 years. Procedural success was obtained in 95% of cases (99/104). The remaining cases included distal lead fracture (n = 3), inferior vena cava laceration necessitating sternotomy (n = 1), and tricuspid valve damage requiring delayed valve replacement (n = 1). There were zero SVC injuries, and procedure-related mortality was 0%. Conclusions: Mechanical, controlled-rotation TLE is effective and can be performed safely without SVC injury. TLE by cardiac surgeons in the OR enables rapid conversion to sternotomy in the event of major complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) lead extraction (n=104). Transvenous mechanical right-left controlled-rotation system was evaluated on Procedural success (complete extraction of all leads without major complications). Transvenous mechanical right-left controlled-rotation lead extraction achieved a 95% procedural success rate with zero superior vena cava injuries and 0% procedure-related mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: