Key result
Transvenous lead extraction using non-powered tools achieved 93.3% complete lead removal and 99% clinical success, with no procedure-related deaths or major complications.
Why the study?
Indications for CIEDs are increasing, and the safety and effectiveness of transvenous lead extraction using non-powered extraction tools needed evaluation.
Is transvenous lead extraction using non-powered tools safe and effective in a low-volume center without on-site surgical support?
Observational (n=88)
No
Is transvenous lead extraction using non-powered tools safe and effective in a low-volume center without on-site surgical support?
Transvenous lead extraction using non-powered tools can be performed safely and effectively in low-volume centers without on-site surgical backup.
May support non-powered extraction in low-volume centers without surgical backup; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Indications for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are increasing. Almost one-third of device-related infections are endocarditis. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) has emerged as an effective and safe approach for treating device-related infections and complications. Multiple types of extraction tools are being used worldwide. Our goal is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of TLE using non-powered extraction tools. The study included patients between October 2018 and July 2022 requiring TLE according to EHRA expert consensus recommendations on lead extraction. A total of 88 consecutive patients were included. Indications for TLE included device-related infections in 74% of the patients. Of those, 32% had device-related endocarditis with or without sepsis. Staphylococcus Aureus was the most frequent pathogen in patients with endocarditis and positive bacteremia, and 57% had negative bloodstream cultures. A total of 150 cardiac pacing and defibrillator leads were targeted for extraction. The mean dwell time for leads was 6.92 ± 4.4 years; 52.8% were older than 5 years, 15.8% were older than ten years, and the longest lead dwell time was 26 years. Patients' age varied between 18 and 98, with a mean age of 66 ± 16 years. Sixty-seven percent of patients were males. Using only non-powered extraction tools, we report 93.3% complete lead removal and 99% clinical success with partial extraction. We report no procedure-related death nor major complications. Minor complication incidence was 6.8%, and all complications resolved spontaneously. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.4%. TLE using non-powered extraction tools is safe and effective even without surgical backup on site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dardari et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) infections and complications requiring lead extraction (n=88). Transvenous lead extraction using non-powered extraction tools was evaluated on Complete lead removal. Transvenous lead extraction using non-powered tools achieved 93.3% complete lead removal and 99% clinical success, with no procedure-related deaths or major complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: