Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While a considerable literature has developed exploring the ways in which military socialization is able to transform individuals from "civilian" to "service" persons, work focusing on the longer-term legacy of these experiences, post-discharge in the civilian environment, is relatively underdeveloped and tends to deal exclusively with paid employment. I tentatively suggest in this article that the concepts of gender (masculinity) and the "sociology of the body" can be put to work to illuminate a number of the potentially long-term transformations effected during immersion in the British armed forces. These unifying themes may transcend the (apparent) diversity of circumstances ex-servicemen experience, from "success" in paid civilian employment, to "failure" in the case of homelessness among a number of the ex-forces population. Both outocmes may be marked by their strongly masculinized contexts, together with concomitant demands made on the physical body. I conclude by arguing that the sociology of the military might benefit from developing contemporary theoretical literatures-including more poststructural approachesthat are laregely absent from the more usual organizational focus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paul Higate (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: