Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: Despite the advent of molecular assessment, banding cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) still have a significant role in diagnostic and prognostic approaches to chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). Area covered: At diagnosis and during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), cytogenetics is used to detect the Philadelphia chromosome, with its typical translocation t(9;22)(q34;q11.2), and any additional or other chromosomal aberrations (ACAs and OCAs) that may arise in 5-10% of cases, the latter associated to transformation of the disease in blast phases. In this review, the potential role of banding cytogenetics and FISH is discussed through a review of published papers on the prognostic impact of these tools in CML treatment and monitoring. Expert commentary: Cytogenetic techniques, including banding cytogenetics and FISH, continue to maintain a crucial role in CML monitoring. At diagnosis and after 3 months of therapy, banding cytogenetics will continue to be an essential test to perform, but it will become redundant after the achievement of a major molecular response (MMR) assessed with molecular techniques. FISH analysis maintains its usefulness in monitoring the response to TKIs only in special situations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Molica et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: