Key result
This review evaluates treatment options for acute severe pulmonary embolism and proposes an algorithm for early risk stratification and timely referral.
This review proposes an algorithm for early risk stratification and timely referral of patients with acute severe pulmonary embolism, evaluating various treatment strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform referral decisions in severe PE; leaves open prospective validation of the algorithm before practice change.
Pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) is the third most frequent cause of cardiovascular death after ischaemic heart disease and stroke. In fatal PE, 2/3 of patients die within first hour of presentation. There is a clinical impetus to rapidly recognize, risk-stratify and appropriately treat patients with acute severe PE. Current recommendations present conflicting classification systems, and there is often some confusion in the clinical evaluation and management of patients with acute severe PE. This review presents a series of real clinical cases, which illustrate the available treatment options, ranging from conservative therapy to thrombolysis through to percutaneous catheter fragmentation and open surgical embolectomy. We evaluate the evidence for the various strategies and propose an algorithm for clinicians with a focus on early risk stratification and timely referral. This is particularly relevant to regional and remote centres, as well as secondary and tertiary institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamilton‐Craig et al. (2008) conducted a review in Acute severe pulmonary embolism. Treatment options (conservative therapy, thrombolysis, percutaneous catheter fragmentation, open surgical embolectomy) was evaluated. This review evaluates treatment options for acute severe pulmonary embolism and proposes an algorithm for early risk stratification and timely referral.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: