Key result
The FIT-HF pilot study will evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a pharmacist-led intervention for the risk-based primary prevention of heart failure in 100 high-risk patients.
Why the study?
New approaches for heart failure prevention are needed, but a quantitative risk-based strategy has not yet been applied to heart failure prevention.
Does a pharmacist-led intervention reduce BNP levels in patients at high predicted risk for heart failure?
RCT (n=100)
Open-label
1:1
No
Does a pharmacist-led intervention reduce BNP levels in patients at high predicted risk for heart failure?
The FIT-HF pilot study will evaluate the feasibility and surrogate efficacy of a quantitative risk-based, pharmacist-led intervention for the primary prevention of heart failure.
May enable pharmacist-led HF prevention if feasible; leaves open BNP effects and efficacy in larger trials.
Background: Given rising morbidity, mortality, and costs due to heart failure (HF), new approaches for prevention are needed. A quantitative risk-based strategy, in line with established guidelines for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention, may efficiently select patients most likely to benefit from intensification of preventive care, but a risk-based strategy has not yet been applied to HF prevention. Methods and Results: The Feasibility of the Implementation of Tools for Heart Failure Risk Prediction (FIT-HF) pilot study will enroll 100 participants free of cardiovascular disease who receive primary care at a single integrated health system and have a 10-year predicted risk of HF of ≥5% based on the previously validated Pooled Cohort equations to Prevent Heart Failure. All participants will complete a health and lifestyle questionnaire and undergo cardiac biomarker (B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP] and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I [hs-cTn]) and echocardiography screening at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either a pharmacist-led intervention or usual care for 1 year. Participants in the intervention arm will undergo consultation with a pharmacist operating under a collaborative practice agreement with a supervising cardiologist. The pharmacist will perform lifestyle counseling and recommend initiation or intensification of therapies to optimize risk factor (hypertension, diabetes, and cholesterol) management according to the most recent clinical practice guidelines. The primary outcome is change in BNP at 1-year, and secondary and exploratory outcomes include changes in hs-cTn, risk factor levels, and cardiac mechanics at follow-up. Feasibility will be examined by monitoring retention rates. Conclusions: The FIT-HF pilot study will offer insight into the feasibility of a strategy of quantitative risk-based enrollment into a pharmacist-led prevention program to reduce heart failure risk. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04684264
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Heart failure prevention (n=100). Pharmacist-led intervention vs. Usual care was evaluated on Change in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) at 1 year. The FIT-HF pilot study will evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of a pharmacist-led intervention for the risk-based primary prevention of heart failure in 100 high-risk patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: