Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This comment divides ‘property rights’ into ‘legal rights’ and ‘economic rights’ in order to distinguish between two very different concepts that are often confounded in the literature. Because of transaction costs, neither kind of rights is ever complete. These are useful in economic analysis as maximizing individuals constantly expand and shrink them. Unlike Hodgson’s, both notions of rights adopted here are positive, useful in analyzing behavior, and not normative as Hodgson (2015) claims them to be. As used by me, they do not devalue property rights as Hodgson claims.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoram Barzel (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: