Key result
Type 2 endoleak after EVAR is linked to a ~16-fold increase in graft-related complications.
Why the study?
To evaluate outcomes in patients with type 2 endoleak and determine the impact of treatment outside the device instructions for use.
Does treatment outside of device instructions for use worsen complications, reintervention rates, and mortality in EVAR patients with type 2 endoleak?
Cohort (n=154)
No
Does treatment outside of device instructions for use worsen complications, reintervention rates, and mortality in EVAR patients with type 2 endoleak?
In patients undergoing EVAR, type 2 endoleaks increase the risk of sac growth and reintervention, and treating these patients outside of device instructions for use significantly increases morbidity and all-cause mortality.
Supports caution against outside-IFU EVAR in T2E patients; hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in randomized trials.
Objective To evaluate outcomes in patients with type 2 endoleak (T2E) and the impact of treatment outside the device instructions for use (IFU). Methods This retrospective single-center study included abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) patients who underwent EVAR (2011- 2024). Primary outcomes were 30-day and mid-term complications, reintervention, and mortality by T2E status. Propensity score matching was applied and secondary analysis stratified outcomes by IFU compliance, comparing within ( in IFU) or outside( out IFU) IFU in each T2E group. Results Among 154 EVAR patients (137 men (89.1%) and 17 women (11.0%); mean age 77.5 ± 7.6 years), 77 were T2E(−), and 77 were T2E(+). Baseline characteristics were similar. Thirty-day complications were comparable (T2E(−): 5, 6.4% vs T2E(+): 2, 2.56%, P = 0.72). The mean follow-up duration was 2.7 ± 2.4 years. Sac diameter change (Δ) decreased in the T2E(−) (7.7 ± 8.4 mm) and enlarged in the T2E(+) (1.79 ± 12.5 mm; P < 0.01). Mid-term graft-related complications (T2E(−): 3, 3.8% vs T2E(+): 49, 62.8%, P < 0.01) and reinterventions (T2E(−): 3, 3.8%, vs T2E(+): 20, 25.6% P < 0.01) were higher in the T2E(+) with no difference in mortality ( P = 1.00). These findings remained after excluding type 1 endoleaks. Among the T2E(+), those treated out IFU had longer hospital stays ( out IFU: 3.0 ± 2.8 days vs in IFU: 1.8 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.03), higher T1E ( out IFU: 3, 33.3% vs in IFU: 1, 4.34%, P < 0.01), higher rates of reintervention ( out IFU: 9, 100.0% vs in IFU:17; 24.6%, P < 0.01) and higher all-cause mortality than those within IFU criteria ( out IFU: 5, 55.0% vs in IFU: 13, 18.8%, P < 0.01). IFU status did not significantly affect outcomes in T2E(−) patients. Conclusions T2E is associated with sac growth and increased reinterventions, but not higher mortality. On subgroup analysis, those T2E(+) treated out IFU had longer hospitalizations, higher T1E rates, more reinterventions, and higher all-cause; but not aneurysmal-related mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Esquetini-Vernon et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) (n=154). Type 2 endoleak (T2E) vs. No type 2 endoleak (T2E(-)) was evaluated on Mid-term graft-related complications (p=<0.01). Type 2 endoleak after EVAR was associated with higher mid-term graft-related complications (62.8% vs 3.8%, P<0.01) and reinterventions (25.6% vs 3.8%, P<0.01) compared to no endoleak.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: