Key result
DSE with intravenous contrast significantly improved visualization of LV segments at peak stress compared to non-contrast DSE in patients with class III obesity (98.9% vs 89.3%; p<0.00001).
Why the study?
Concern exists regarding the adequacy of visualization of stress echocardiograms performed without intravenous contrast in persons with Class III obesity.
Does the use of intravenous contrast during dobutamine stress echocardiography improve visualization and interpretability of LV segments in patients with class III obesity?
Cohort (n=128)
Does the use of intravenous contrast during dobutamine stress echocardiography improve visualization and interpretability of LV segments in patients with class III obesity?
Absolute Event Rate: 98.9% vs 89.3%
p-value: p=<0.00001
The use of intravenous contrast during dobutamine stress echocardiography significantly improves the visualization and interpretability of left ventricular segments in patients with class III obesity.
May enhance DSE feasibility in class III obesity; hypothesis-generating for diagnostic accuracy and outcomes.
Background: Concern exists regarding adequacy of visualization of stress echocardiograms performed without intravenous contrast in persons with Class III obesity (body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2). Methods: Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) was performed on 128 candidates for bariatric surgery with class III obesity without chest pain or pre-existent coronary artery disease (CAD). DSE without intravenous contrast was initially performed on 62 patients with class III obesity, then was subsequently was performed with intravenous contrast on 66 patients with class III obesity. Left ventricular (LV) regional wall motion was assessed at baseline and peak stress using the 16-segment model. Results: In the intravenous contrast group 1046 of 1056 LV segments studied (99.1%) were well-visualized and interpretable at baseline and 1044 of 1056 LV segments studied (98.9%) were well-visualized and interpretable at peak stress. In the non-contrast group 905 of 992 segments studied (91.2%) were well-visualized and interpretable at baseline and 886 of 992 segments studied (89.3%) were well-visualized and interpretable at peak stress. A significantly greater number of LV segments were well-visualized and interpretable in the intravenous contrast group than in the group compared to the non-contrast group, at baseline and at peak stress (p < 0.00001 for both). DSE was positive for ischemia in 1 patient. All patients underwent bariatric surgery without cardiovascular complications. Six months after surgery, all patients were alive; none developed cardiovascular events. Conclusion: The use of intravenous contrast during DSE significantly improves visualization and interpretability of LV segments in patients with class III obesity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlino et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Class III obesity (n=128). Dobutamine stress echocardiography with intravenous contrast vs. Dobutamine stress echocardiography without intravenous contrast was evaluated on Well-visualized and interpretable LV segments at peak stress (p=<0.00001). DSE with intravenous contrast significantly improved visualization of LV segments at peak stress compared to non-contrast DSE in patients with class III obesity (98.9% vs 89.3%; p<0.00001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: