Key result
Quantitative human measurements of endoneurial and nerve blood flow are not yet available, but their development may present new insights into nerve disorders.
Quantitative human measurements of nerve blood flow are not yet available, but their development could provide new insights into nerve disorders.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not yet guide neuropathy management; leaves open development of quantitative human nerve flow metrics for future mechanistic insights.
Over 3 decades ago, seminal work by Phillip Low and colleagues established exquisite physiology around the measurement of nerve blood flow (NBF). Although not widely explored recently, its connection to the clinic has awaited human methodology. While human studies have not achieved a convincing level of rigour, newer imaging technologies are offering early information. The peripheral nerve trunk has parallel blood flow compartments that include epineurial flow dominated by arteriovenous shunts and downstream endoneurial blood flow (EBF). NBF and EBF have lower values than central nervous system blood flow, lack autoregulation yet have sympathetic and peptidergic neurovascular control. Contrary to expectation, injury to nerves is often associated with rises in NBF rather than ischemia, a finding of biological interest corroborated by human studies. Despite its potential importance, quantitative human measurements of EBF and NBF are not yet available. However, with development, careful NBF analysis may present new insights into nerve disorders. Muscle Nerve 57: 884-895, 2018.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas W. Zochodne (2017) conducted a review in Nerve disorders. Measurement of nerve blood flow (NBF) was evaluated. Quantitative human measurements of endoneurial and nerve blood flow are not yet available, but their development may present new insights into nerve disorders.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: