Why the study?
HRV mainly reflects cardiac activity, making it difficult to comprehensively capture peripheral vascular regulation by the autonomic nervous system.
Does coherence analysis of peripheral blood flow signals correlate with HRV for evaluating autonomic nervous system function in healthy subjects?
Does coherence analysis of peripheral blood flow signals correlate with HRV for evaluating autonomic nervous system function in healthy subjects?
Peripheral blood flow signal analysis may provide a novel non-invasive method to evaluate autonomic nervous system function, complementing traditional HRV analysis.
May complement HRV for peripheral ANS assessment; leaves open validation before clinical use.
Introduction: The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is crucial for maintaining homeostasis in the body and plays an important role in cardiovascular diseases. Although heart rate variability (HRV) is a commonly used non-invasive clinical tool to evaluate the function of ANS, it mainly reflects cardiac activity, and it is difficult to comprehensively capture the functional information of peripheral vascular regulation of ANS. Methods: This study explored the feasibility of using peripheral blood flow signals to evaluate the function of ANS. The ANS function of healthy subjects was artificially intervened by giving glucose solutions at different temperatures. Subsequently, the correlation between peripheral blood flow signals and HRV was further explored. Finally, the quantitative relationship was verified by using an independent dataset. Results: Coherence analysis shows that within a specific frequency band, the peak values of peripheral blood flow signals are significantly correlated with HRV. Discussion: This study shows that peripheral blood flow signals analysis provides a new non-invasive way to evaluate the function of ANS. This method not only complements the limitations of traditional HRV analysis, but also hopes to promote the construction of a more comprehensive and multi-dimensional ANS functional evaluation system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: