Key result
In an ex situ normothermic perfusion model of human liver, AAV-SYD12 and AAV-LK03 showed the highest functionality under non-neutralizing conditions, whereas AAV8-derived variants performed efficiently in the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
Why the study?
Developing clinically predictive model systems to evaluate liver-directed gene transfer and gene editing technologies is challenging due to the complexity of the human liver.
Ex situ normothermic perfusion of whole human livers provides a viable preclinical model for evaluating liver-targeted AAV gene therapies and assessing the impact of neutralizing antibodies.
Should not yet guide AAV capsid choice in patients; hypothesis-generating for liver gene therapy vector optimization.
Developing clinically predictive model systems for evaluating gene transfer and gene editing technologies has become increasingly important in the era of personalized medicine. Liver-directed gene therapies present a unique challenge due to the complexity of the human liver. In this work, we describe the application of whole human liver explants in an ex situ normothermic perfusion system to evaluate a set of fourteen natural and bioengineered adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors directly in human liver, in the presence and absence of neutralizing human sera. Under non-neutralizing conditions, the recently developed AAV variants, AAV-SYD12 and AAV-LK03, emerged as the most functional variants in terms of cellular uptake and transgene expression. However, when assessed in the presence of human plasma containing anti-AAV neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), vectors of human origin, specifically those derived from AAV2/AAV3b, were extensively neutralized, whereas AAV8-derived variants performed efficiently. This study establishes the use of normothermic liver perfusion as an invaluable preclinical model for evaluating liver-targeted gene therapies and providing guidance for making essential decisions that promote the most effective translational programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cabanes‐Creus et al. (2023) studied Preclinical evaluation of AAV vectors (n=2). 14 natural and bioengineered AAV vectors vs. Neutralizing vs non-neutralizing conditions was evaluated on AAV vector cellular uptake and transgene expression. In an ex situ normothermic perfusion model of human liver, AAV-SYD12 and AAV-LK03 showed the highest functionality under non-neutralizing conditions, whereas AAV8-derived variants performed efficiently in the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: