Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the reproducibility and accuracy of the PAPNET system in finding and presenting abnormal and atypical cells. STUDY DESIGN: To assess the potential variation of a double PAPNET scan on the same cervical smear, 516 cervical smears from women with abnormal histologic diagnoses were scanned twice via PAPNET and reviewed by two independent examiners in a double-blind trial. RESULTS: The false negative rate of 5.7% in conventional screening was reduced to 0.4% and 0.8%, respectively, by PAPNET testing. The resulting concurrence of the first and the second PAPNET reviews was 99.2%, indicating the accuracy, sensitivity and consistency of this supplemental test. CONCLUSION: The results obtained demonstrate the reproducibility and accuracy of the system in finding and presenting abnormal and atypical cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jenny et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: