We assess the sensitivity of void shapes to the nature of dark energy that was pointed out in recent studies and also investigate whether or not void shapes are useable as an observational probe in galaxy redshift surveys. Our focus is on the evolution of the mean void ellipticity and its underlying physical cause. To this end, we analyse the morphological properties of voids in five sets of cosmological N-body simulations, each with a different nature of dark energy. To address the question of whether galaxy redshift surveys yield sufficiently accurate void morphologies, voids in the dark matter distribution are compared to those in the halo population. Voids are identified using the parameter-free Watershed Void Finder. The effect of redshift distortions is investigated as well. The main conclusions of this study are as follows: (i) the statistically significant sensitivity of voids in the dark matter distribution is confirmed; (ii) the level of clustering as measured by σ8(z) is identified as the main cause of differences in the mean void shape 〈ε〉; and (iii) in the halo and/or galaxy distribution, it is practically unfeasible to distinguish at a statistically significant level between the various cosmologies due to the sparsity and spatial bias of the sample.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2012 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: