Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The performance of the M06-L density functional has been tested for four databases of NMR isotropic chemical shielding constants. Comparison with the B3LYP, BLYP, HCTH, KT1, KT2, LSDA, OPBE, OLYP, PBE, TPSS, and VSXC functionals shows that M06-L has improved performance for calculating NMR chemical shielding constants, especially for highly correlated systems. We also found that VSXC and M06-L have encouraging accuracy for calculating (13)C chemical shielding constants, and both functionals perform very well for the chemical shielding constants in the o-benzyne molecule.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: