Key result
Surgical external iliac artery access for TAVR was associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate (2% vs 12%, p=0.05) and a trend toward fewer unplanned endarterectomies compared to common femoral artery access.
Why the study?
Many patients undergoing TAVR have peripheral artery disease requiring surgical access, prompting evaluation of preoperative risk factors, procedural characteristics, and outcomes between surgical CFA and EIA access through a retro-inguinal groin incision.
Does surgical external iliac artery access improve procedural safety and outcomes compared to common femoral artery access in patients undergoing TAVR requiring surgical cutdown?
Cohort (n=130)
No
Does surgical external iliac artery access improve procedural safety and outcomes compared to common femoral artery access in patients undergoing TAVR requiring surgical cutdown?
Absolute Event Rate: 2% vs 12%
p-value: p=0.05
Surgical external iliac artery access is a safe and feasible alternative to common femoral artery access for TAVR in patients with severe peripheral artery disease, offering similar complication rates and potentially fewer unplanned endarterectomies.
May support external iliac access to reduce TAVR readmissions; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Background Many patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) have peripheral artery disease necessitating surgical access. This study reviews the preoperative risk factors, procedural characteristics, and outcomes in patients undergoing surgical common femoral artery (CFA) and external iliac artery (EIA) access through a retro-inguinal groin incision for TAVR. Methods A single-center TAVR database was retrospectively analyzed for patients undergoing surgical cutdown (January 1, 2016 - December 31, 2020). Access sites were evaluated on preoperative imaging. Data on demographics, imaging, procedural characteristics, and outcomes were collected. The vascular surgeon selected the cutdown site. Results A hundred and thirty TAVR patients had surgical cutdown. The choice of access site was either the common femoral artery (82 patients, 63%) or the iliac artery (48 patients, 37%). There was no difference in age, BMI, or medical risk factors. There was no difference in iliac diameter or circumferential iliac calcium. In the iliac group, there was a smaller mean CFA size and a higher incidence of circumferential CFA calcium. In the femoral group, there was: a lower mean sheath-to-CFA ratio, a trend toward increased unplanned endarterectomy, and a higher incidence of 30-day readmission. There was no difference in adjunct procedure use. Conclusion EIA surgical access had similar complication rates and length of stay with a reduced tendency for unplanned endarterectomy when compared to CFA access. The EIA is a suitable access site for TAVR in select patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goerge et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Severe aortic stenosis with peripheral arterial disease (n=130). Surgical external iliac artery (EIA) access vs. Surgical common femoral artery (CFA) access was evaluated on 30-day readmission rate (p=0.05). Surgical external iliac artery access for TAVR was associated with a lower 30-day readmission rate (2% vs 12%, p=0.05) and a trend toward fewer unplanned endarterectomies compared to common femoral artery access.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: