Key result
A BMI >30 kg/m2 was an independent prognostic factor for postoperative complications (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.43-7.03), whereas subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness and visceral fat area were not.
Why the study?
Obesity affects outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery, but whether CT-measured subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness can serve as a surrogate for visceral fat area to predict short- and long-term outcomes is unknown.
Can preoperative CT measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral fat area (VFA) predict postoperative complications and overall survival after elective colorectal cancer surgery better than BMI?
Cohort
No
Can preoperative CT measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral fat area (VFA) predict postoperative complications and overall survival after elective colorectal cancer surgery better than BMI?
Odds Ratio: 3.2 (95% CI 1.43–7.03)
BMI is a better independent predictor of postoperative complications after elective colorectal cancer surgery than CT-derived subcutaneous or visceral fat measurements.
Supports BMI over CT fat measures for predicting complications after colorectal cancer surgery; leaves open prospective validation in broader cohorts.
Background Obesity can be measured by different indices, either as body mass index (BMI) or by more intuitive radiological measurements, and obesity has been shown to have an impact on outcome after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Purpose To investigate whether the thickness of the subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) in the abdominal wall can be used as a surrogate for the visceral fat area (VFA)—both measured on computed tomography (CT)—in prediction of short- and long-term outcomes after elective CRC surgery. Material and Methods Preoperative CT scans of all patients having elective CRC surgery (stages I–III), in two consecutive years at a single-center institution, were used to measure the SAT (mm) and VFA (cm 2 ). BMI was calculated for each patient. The three different obesity indices were used in different analyses in order to predict postoperative complications and overall survival. Results A BMI >30 kg/m 2 was an independent prognostic factor in postoperative complications (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43–7.03). SAT and VFA were not able to predict complications. Patients considered visceral obese according to a high VFA (>130 cm 2 ) had poorer survival (hazard ratio 1.53, 95% CI 1.00–2.36) compared to non-obese patients, but in the adjusted model, VFA lost its predictive power. BMI and SAT were not able to predict mortality. Conclusion The novel measurement of the thickness of SAT in a preoperative setting before elective CRC surgery cannot predict either postoperative complications or overall survival; the other obesity indices had better predictive features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frostberg et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Colorectal cancer. BMI >30 kg/m2 vs. Non-obese patients was evaluated on Postoperative complications (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.43-7.03). A BMI >30 kg/m2 was an independent prognostic factor for postoperative complications (OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.43-7.03), whereas subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness and visceral fat area were not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: