Key result
First-time ablation using the novel PulseSelect circular array PFA catheter achieved acute pulmonary vein isolation in 100% of targeted veins with no major adverse events.
Why the study?
Data on the commercially available novel CE-approved circular array pulsed field ablation catheter are sparse, and real-world data assessing its feasibility, safety, and acute efficacy were needed.
Is the novel circular array PFA catheter feasible, safe, and acutely effective for PVI and ablation beyond PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=100)
Is the novel circular array PFA catheter feasible, safe, and acutely effective for PVI and ablation beyond PVI in patients with atrial fibrillation?
The novel circular array PFA catheter demonstrates high acute efficacy and safety for PVI and extended ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Supports acute feasibility of novel circular PFA catheter; leaves open durability and comparative outcomes in randomized trials.
Background and Aims: Various pulsed field ablation (PFA) systems are currently being developed. Recently, a novel CE-approved circular array PFA catheter (PulseSelect™ PFA System, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was introduced. Data on this commercially available system are sparse. The aim was to elucidate real-world data assessing the feasibility, safety, and acute efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and ablation beyond PVI with this novel ablation system. Methods: Consecutive patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing first-time ablation with the circular PFA catheter were enrolled in this study. In patients with persistent AF and left atrial (LA) enlargement (LA area > 20 cm2), additional left atrial roof ablation (LARA) was performed. Those with concomitant typical atrial flutter received adjunctive cavo-tricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation. Results: A total of 100 AF patients were included (29% female, 50% persistent AF). Of these, 33 patients (33%) underwent adjunctive LARA, 1 patient (1%) received posterior wall isolation, and 6 patients (6%) required additional CTI ablation. The skin-to-skin procedural time averaged 66.3 ± 13.8 min, while the fluoroscopy time and dose area product were 13.7 ± 4.7 min and 6.8 ± 4.9 Gycm2, respectively. Acute PVI was achieved in 100% of pulmonary veins. A bidirectional conduction block of the LARA and CTI lines was confirmed in all patients, and no major adverse events were reported. Conclusions: These real-world data demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and acute efficacy of PVI and ablation beyond PVI using a novel circular array PFA catheter in patients with atrial fibrillation and flutter. The system can easily be integrated with standard PVI workflows. Further and larger studies are warranted to assess the clinical long-term effectiveness and safety of this PFA system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yogarajah et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=100). PulseSelect PFA System (circular array PFA catheter) was evaluated on Acute pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). First-time ablation using the novel PulseSelect circular array PFA catheter achieved acute pulmonary vein isolation in 100% of targeted veins with no major adverse events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: