Key result
Pulmonary blood volume index by cardiovascular magnetic resonance was an independent predictor of increased left atrial pressure in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (OR 1.97 per 10% increase).
Why the study?
Non-invasive assessment of left ventricular diastolic function and filling pressure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains an open issue.
Does pulmonary blood volume index (PBVI) by CMR accurately estimate left atrial pressure and diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Observational (n=69)
Blinded analysis
No
Does pulmonary blood volume index (PBVI) by CMR accurately estimate left atrial pressure and diastolic dysfunction in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Odds Ratio: 1.97 (95% CI 1.06–3.68)
p-value: p=0.03
PBVI assessed by CMR is a promising quantitative biomarker for detecting and grading haemodynamic congestion and elevated left atrial pressure in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
PBVI by CMR may aid noninvasive LAP assessment in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
AIMS: The non-invasive assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function and filling pressure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is still an open issue. Pulmonary blood volume index (PBVI) by cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has been proposed as a quantitative biomarker of haemodynamic congestion. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of PBVI for left atrial pressure (LAP) estimation in patients with HCM. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively identified 69 consecutive HCM outpatients (age 58 ± 11 years; 83% men) who underwent both transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and CMR. Guideline-based detection of LV diastolic dysfunction was assessed by TTE, blinded to CMR results. PBVI was calculated as the product of right ventricular stroke volume index and the number of cardiac cycles for a bolus of gadolinium to pass through the pulmonary circulation as assessed by first-pass perfusion imaging. Compared to patients with normal LAP, patients with increased LAP showed significantly larger PBVI (463 ± 127 vs. 310 ± 86 mL/m2, P < 0.001). PBVI increased progressively with worsening New York Heart Association functional class and echocardiographic stages of diastolic dysfunction (P < 0.001 for both). At the best cut-off point of 413 mL/m2, PBVI yielded good diagnostic accuracy for the diagnosis of LV diastolic dysfunction with increased LAP [C-statistic = 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.94]. At multivariable logistic regression analysis, PBVI was an independent predictor of increased LAP (odds ratio per 10% increase: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.06-3.68; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: PBVI is a promising CMR application for assessment of diastolic function and LAP in patients with HCM and may serve as a quantitative marker for detection, grading, and monitoring of haemodynamic congestion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ricci et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=69). Pulmonary blood volume index (PBVI) vs. Normal left atrial pressure was evaluated on Prediction of increased left atrial pressure (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.06-3.68, p=0.03). Pulmonary blood volume index by cardiovascular magnetic resonance was an independent predictor of increased left atrial pressure in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (OR 1.97 per 10% increase).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: