Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The first part of the article introduces the concept of bio-camera and bio-screen seen as a staged synergy between the performer’s living body and the accessible transmedia object: a smartphone. The point of departure for the investigation of the performative potential of the digital objects comes from Kantor’s conception of the ‘bio-object’ – where performer and object have the same degree of agency and both are treated as dramaturgical material or an artwork. In order to discuss the ontological status of bio-screen and bio-camera the argument investigates the Theatre Cricot2’s bio-object and examines an everyday immanent synergy between a living body and a smartphone. The function of multiple/multidirectional types of immanent synergies are explained and differentiated from the staged synergy that is activated in the context of performance. The second part of this article offers a detailed evaluation of a set of exercises with smartphones that entail the use of the telematic connection. Given that the bio-screen and bio-camera represent a broad range of approaches, this article narrows its focus to a chosen set of exercises presented in the form of a semi-photo essay together with analytical commentary. Therefore, the first and second parts differ in the manner of presentation and articulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anna Makrzanowska (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: