Key result
Chest wall-to-LV distance predicts Sokolow-Lyon voltage more strongly than LV mass.
Why the study?
ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy perform poorly, and distance factors like chest wall-to-left ventricle distance and subcutaneous adipose tissue may independently modulate ECG amplitudes.
Do anatomical factors such as chest wall-left ventricle distance and subcutaneous adipose tissue independently affect ECG amplitudes compared to left ventricular mass?
Cross-Sectional (n=49)
Do anatomical factors such as chest wall-left ventricle distance and subcutaneous adipose tissue independently affect ECG amplitudes compared to left ventricular mass?
Effect estimate: std. β = -0.48
p-value: p=< 0.002
Non-cardiac anatomical factors, particularly chest wall-left ventricle distance, are stronger predictors of ECG amplitudes than left ventricular mass, questioning the validity of standard ECG-LVH criteria.
CWLV distance may confound Sokolow-Lyon voltage more than LVM; hypothesis-generating for anatomy-adjusted ECG-LVH criteria.
Background Electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH) show poor diagnostic performance. Distance factors, such as the chest wall – left ventricle (CWLV) distance and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) have been proposed as alternative modulators of ECG amplitudes both on a theoretical and a clinical basis. We aimed to investigate the independent associations of CWLV, SAT, and LVM with ECG amplitudes. Methods In this cross-sectional study using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in 49 healthy volunteers (22 female, mean age 37.1 years, median BMI 22.8 kg/m 2 ), we analysed the CWLV distance, SAT and LVM in relation to QRS amplitudes from a resting 12‑lead ECG. Results In a multivariable regression model, CWLV distance, measured with excellent reliability (inter-observer ICC = 0.995, p < 0.001), was the strongest predictor of Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SV1 + RV5), followed by LVM (std. β = −0.48 and 0.38 respectively, both p < 0.002, adj. R 2 = 0.53). SAT correlated with most ECG amplitudes to a similar degree as did LVM, but in the opposite direction. In females, CWLV distance but not LVM correlated with Sokolow-Lyon voltage. Conclusions We found that a non-cardiac variable (CWLV) was a stronger predictor of ECG amplitudes than was LVM, and that SAT was negatively correlated with ECG amplitudes, even in a sample with a normal median BMI. These findings suggest that distance factors may influence the ECG of non-obese persons and contribute to the limited accuracy of ECG-LVH criteria. Our findings also question the validity of Sokolow-Lyon voltage for assessment of LVM in females.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carlhäll et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy volunteers (n=49). Chest wall-left ventricle (CWLV) distance was evaluated on Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SV1 + RV5) (std. β = -0.48, p=< 0.002). Chest wall-left ventricle distance was a stronger predictor of Sokolow-Lyon voltage than left ventricular mass (std. β = -0.48 vs 0.38, both p < 0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: