Key result
The selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitors should be individualized based on clinical, demographic, and genetic factors to balance ischemic and bleeding risks.
Why the study?
Given differing pharmacodynamic, pharmacogenomic, and safety-efficacy profiles among clopidogrel, prasugrel, and ticagrelor, the optimal selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitors remains an active area of investigation.
Systematic Review
Selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitors in ASCVD patients should be individualized based on clinical, demographic, and genetic factors, balancing ischemic and bleeding risks.
Supports individualized P2Y12 selection in ASCVD practice; extends prior syntheses by emphasizing dynamic risk reassessment.
INTRODUCTION: Antiplatelet therapy is key for secondary prevention in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, particularly those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While aspirin has historically been the standard of care agent, oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors - namely clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor - have emerged as key adjunctive therapies as well as treatment alternatives. Given their differing pharmacodynamic, pharmacogenomic, and safety - efficacy profiles, the optimal selection of these agents remains an area of investigation. AREAS COVERED: This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pharmacologic profiles of oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor, and their comparative effects when used with or without aspirin. MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched until August 5, 2025. Special attention is given to high-risk subgroups (e.g. clopidogrel poor-responders, diabetics, East Asians, females, and patients requiring concomitant oral anticoagulation), and to strategies involving platelet function or genetic testing. EXPERT OPINION: The selection of oral P2Y₁₂ inhibiting therapy should be tailored to the individual patient, taking into consideration clinical, procedural, demographic, and genetic factors, as well as the dynamic nature of ischemic and bleeding risks over time. Specific considerations are warranted for certain patient subgroups, as well as those with clopidogrel poor responsiveness, or patients with contraindications to ticagrelor or prasugrel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galli et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Oral P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor) was evaluated. The selection of oral P2Y12 inhibitors should be individualized based on clinical, demographic, and genetic factors to balance ischemic and bleeding risks.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: