Key result
Outpatient antiarrhythmic therapy shows no benefit over observation for idiopathic VT resolution in infants.
Why the study?
Does chronic anti-arrhythmic treatment improve the time to ventricular tachycardia resolution in infants with structurally normal hearts?
Cohort (n=31)
No
Does chronic anti-arrhythmic treatment improve the time to ventricular tachycardia resolution in infants with structurally normal hearts?
In infants with asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia and structurally normal hearts, the condition is benign and resolves spontaneously, suggesting that chronic anti-arrhythmic therapy may not be necessary.
Supports observation without anti-arrhythmics in asymptomatic infants with idiopathic VT; leaves open randomized confirmation.
We evaluated the presentation, treatment, and outcome of infants who present with ventricular tachycardia in the first year of life. Seventy-six infants were admitted to our institution with a diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia between January, 1987 and May, 2006. Forty-five infants were excluded from the study because of additional confounding diagnoses including accelerated idioventricular rhythm, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, supraventricular tachycardia with aberrancy, long QT syndrome, cardiac rhabdomyoma, myocarditis, congenital lesions, or incomplete data. The remaining 31 included infants who had a median age at presentation of 1 day, with a range from 1 to 255 days, and a mean ventricular tachycardia rate of 213 beats per minute, with a range from 171 to 280, at presentation. The infants were treated chronically with propranolol (38.7%), amiodarone (12.9%), mexiletine (3.2%), propranolol and mexiletine (9.7%), or propranolol and procainamide (6.5%). The median duration of treatment was 13 months, with a range from 3 to 105 months. Ventricular tachycardia resolved spontaneously in all infants. No patient died, or received catheter ablation or device therapy. Median age at last ventricular tachycardia was 59 days, with a range from 1 to 836 days. Mean follow-up was 45 months, with a range from 5 to 164 months, with a mean ventricular tachycardia-free period of 40 months. Infants with asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia, a structurally normal heart, and no additional electrophysiological diagnosis all had spontaneous resolution of tachycardia. Furthermore, log-rank analysis of the time to ventricular tachycardia resolution showed no difference between children who received chronic outpatient anti-arrhythmic treatment and those who had no such therapy. While indications for therapy cannot be determined from this study, lack of symptoms or myocardial dysfunction suggests that therapy may not be necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levin et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Idiopathic ventricular tachycardia in infants with structurally normal hearts (n=31). Outpatient oral anti-arrhythmic therapy (propranolol, amiodarone, mexiletine, procainamide) vs. No outpatient anti-arrhythmic therapy was evaluated on Spontaneous resolution of ventricular tachycardia (time to resolution) (p=0.167). Outpatient oral anti-arrhythmic therapy did not significantly alter time to spontaneous arrhythmia resolution compared with no therapy in infants with idiopathic VT (100% vs 100%, log-rank p=0.167).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: