This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective : To test the validity, reliability and discriminating capacity of an instrument to measure support, collaboration and communication in clinical working. Study setting: National Health Service organisations providing maternity care in England. Design: Validation study. Participants : Health professionals working in maternity care (177 doctors and 1991 midwives). Data collection: On-line questionnaire in organisations providing maternity care in 2007. Main outcome measure: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses identifying factors making up the Working in Healthcare measure (WHQ) Principal findings: Marked differences were found between the professional groups in their perceptions of the working environment: medical staff were more likely to feel supported and engaged and midwifery staff less likely to be positive about collaborative working. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two factor structure for the Working in Healthcare Questionnaire (WHQ) with a 9-item version of the measure. Two factors represented by sub-scales ‘support and encouragement’ and ‘communication in practice’, were supported by confirmatory factor analysis. Conclusion: The study shows that the WHQ-9 is a valid, reliable and discriminating self-report measure of clinical working, reflecting the work experience and perceptions of healthcare staff, which could be used to monitor change over time and to support quality improvement and person-centered care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Redshaw et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: