Key result
Greater accumulation of leisure-time physical activity across adulthood was associated with a more favourable CVD biomarker profile, including lower t-PA (difference -2.2% per unit increase in LTPA).
Why the study?
Does leisure-time physical activity across adulthood improve cardiovascular disease biomarkers at age 60-64 in adults?
Cohort (n=1,754)
Does leisure-time physical activity across adulthood improve cardiovascular disease biomarkers at age 60-64 in adults?
Mean Difference: -2.2 (95% CI -3.6–-0.8)
Earlier uptake and long-term maintenance of leisure-time physical activity across adulthood is associated with a more favorable cardiovascular biomarker profile in early old age.
Supports sustained leisure-time physical activity from adulthood; extends cumulative biomarker evidence but leaves causality for RCTs open.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study examined associations between leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) across adulthood (from age 36) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) biomarkers at age 60-64. METHODS: LTPA was reported by study participants from the MRC National Survey of Health and Development at ages 36, 43, 53 and 60-64 (n = 1754) and categorised as inactive, moderately active (1-4/month) or most active (5+/month) at each age. Linear regression was used to examine associations between a cumulative adulthood LTPA score (range = 0-8), and change in LTPA between ages 36 and 60-64 (i.e. always inactive, became inactive, became active, always active) and inflammatory [C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)], endothelial [tissue-Plasminogen Activator (t-PA), E-selectin] and adipokine [leptin, adiponectin] measures extracted from overnight fasting blood samples at age 60-64. RESULTS: The more active a participant was over adulthood, the better their biomarker profile, e.g. fully-adjusted difference in t-PA (both sexes) and adiponectin (women) per unit increase in the LTPA score (95% confidence interval) = -2.2% (-3.6; -0.8) and 2.0% (0.2; 3.8). Those that became active at age 60-64 showed slightly healthier biomarker profiles than those that became inactive [e.g. fully-adjusted difference in IL-6 = -9.9% (-23.9; 4.1) vs. -3.8% (-12.4; 4.8)], although the best profiles were seen for those always active [IL-6: -15.0% (-24.2; -5.7)], when compared with the always inactive group. CONCLUSIONS: Greater accumulation of LTPA across adulthood was associated with a more favourable CVD biomarker profile in early old age. Earlier uptake and long-term maintenance of LTPA may provide the greatest benefits for CVD prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elhakeem et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease risk (n=1,754). Leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) vs. Inactive or lower LTPA was evaluated on Cardiovascular disease biomarkers (including t-PA) at age 60-64 (Difference -2.2% per unit increase in LTPA score, 95% CI -3.6 to -0.8). Greater accumulation of leisure-time physical activity across adulthood was associated with a more favourable CVD biomarker profile, including lower t-PA (difference -2.2% per unit increase in LTPA).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: