Key result
In patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, imatinib was associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events compared to dasatinib (HR 2.13) but a lower risk compared to nilotinib (HR 0.50) over 5 years.
Why the study?
BCR-ABL TKIs have revolutionized CML treatment, but concern has arisen regarding their cardiac safety profile, prompting comparison of long-term cardiovascular risks among these agents.
Does treatment with dasatinib or nilotinib compared to imatinib alter the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia?
Cohort (n=3,722)
Yes
Does treatment with dasatinib or nilotinib compared to imatinib alter the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia?
Hazard Ratio: 2.13 (95% CI 1.15–3.94)
Absolute Event Rate: 5.23% vs 1.19%
p-value: p=0.016
In patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, nilotinib is associated with a higher 5-year risk of adverse cardiovascular events compared to imatinib, whereas dasatinib appears to have a better cardiovascular safety profile than imatinib.
Background Breakpoint cluster region-Abelson gene (BCR-ABL) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have revolutionized the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, concern has arisen about the cardiac safety profile of these drugs. Objectives This study aims to compare long-term risks of adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (ACE), heart failure or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, and venous thromboembolic events (VTE) in patients with CML treated with BCR-ABL TKIs, using data from a large multinational network. Methods Patients aged ≥ 18 years with CML treated with imatinib, dasatinib, or nilotinib without prior cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease were included. We used propensity score matching to balance the cohorts. The 5-year cumulative incidences and hazard ratios were calculated. Results We identified 3,722 patients with CML under treatment with imatinib ( n = 1,906), dasatinib ( n = 1,269), and nilotinib ( n = 547). Patients with imatinib compared to dasatinib showed a higher hazard ratio (HR) for ACE (HR 2,13, 95% CI 1.15–3.94, p = 0.016). Patients with imatinib presented a lower HR than nilotinib for ACE (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30–0.83, p = 0.0074). In relation to heart failure or LVEF < 50%, patients with imatinib had a higher HR than dasatinib (HR 9.41, 95% CI 1.22–72.17, p = 0.03), but no significant difference was observed between imatinib and nilotinib (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.215–1.01, p = 0.064). Conclusion In this retrospective study with a large number of patients with CML, those treated with nilotinib had a higher 5-year ratio of ACE, while patients with dasatinib showed a lower ratio than patients with imatinib. The ratio of heart failure was higher in patients with imatinib than in patients with dasatinib, but not when compared to nilotinib.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nunes et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (n=3,722). Imatinib vs. Dasatinib was evaluated on Adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (ACE) (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.15-3.94, p=0.016). In patients with chronic myeloid leukemia, imatinib was associated with a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events compared to dasatinib (HR 2.13) but a lower risk compared to nilotinib (HR 0.50) over 5 years.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: