Key result
A systematic review of 73 articles on arterial blood pressure artifact management algorithms found poor generalizability and inter-comparability, preventing the identification of a leading method.
Why the study?
Arterial blood pressure artifacts are pervasive and decline signal utility, but existing artifact management strategies had not been comprehensively reviewed.
Systematic Review (n=73)
Existing algorithms for ABP artifact management show strong effectiveness but lack generalizability and external validation, limiting their clinical utility.
Algorithms for ABP artifact management lack generalizability for clinical adoption; leaves open identification of optimal methods pending standardized external validation.
Arterial blood pressure (ABP) is a broadly measured vital signal used to monitor cardiovascular health through raw signal and derived metrics. Artifacts are a pervasive issue, resulting in a declined utility of the signal. The aim of this review was to examine the existing literature pertinent to artifact management strategies in ABP signals. A search of five databases was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The search question examined existing algorithms for artifact management in ABP signals. The initial search yielded 15,564 articles (update included 1967 additional). The review included 73 articles. Categories included: (1) artifact management in low-frequency signals, (2) artifact management in full-waveform signals, (3) identification of valid or fiducial points. There were several algorithms that achieved strong effectiveness results. However, there was poor algorithm generalizability and inter-comparability due to insufficient population size, diversity in recording methodologies, and external validation. This made it difficult to quantitatively elucidate a leading method. Real-time utility was also not mentioned, critical for clinical use. This work provides novel insights into the literature regarding artifact management in ABP, identifying shortcomings and ways in which a more generalizable solution can be identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bergmann et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Arterial blood pressure artifacts (n=73). Artifact management algorithms was evaluated on Algorithm effectiveness and generalizability. A systematic review of 73 articles on arterial blood pressure artifact management algorithms found poor generalizability and inter-comparability, preventing the identification of a leading method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: