Key result
An LSTM-RNN approach for estimating blood pressure from oscillometric waveforms yielded an average mean error of -1.2 ± 5.9 mmHg for SBP and 1.8 ± 8.8 mmHg for DBP compared to a visual reference method.
Why the study?
Does an LSTM-RNN approach accurately estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressure from oscillometric waveforms compared to a visual reference method?
Does an LSTM-RNN approach accurately estimate systolic and diastolic blood pressure from oscillometric waveforms compared to a visual reference method?
An LSTM-RNN approach using time-domain features from oscillometric waveforms can accurately estimate blood pressure, potentially outperforming traditional methods.
LSTM-RNN may aid oscillometric BP estimation; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
This article presents a novel method for estimating systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from time-domain features extracted from oscillometric waveforms (OWs) using a long short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent neural network (RNN) method. First, we extract seven time-domain features from each cycle of OW, including the cuff pressure, the cardiac period, the trough-to-peak amplitude of OW, the time between the trough and the peak of the OW, the slopes of the oscillometric waveform envelope (OWE), and the maximum upslope of individual OWs. Second, we locate each feature vector in an noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) record in one of three different phases (classes), namely, presystolic (PS), between systolic and diastolic (BSD), and after diastolic (AD), and form a target sequence. Then, we propose an LSTM-RNN approach to effectively learn the complex nonlinear relationship between the feature vector sequences and the target sequence. The SBP and DBP points are then obtained by mapping the beats at which the network output sequence switches from PS phase to BSD phase and from BSD phase to AD phase, respectively, to the deflation curve. Adopting a tenfold cross-validation scheme and using a database of 350 NIBP recordings gave an average mean error of -1.2 ± 5.9 mmHg for SBP and 1.8 ± 8.8 mmHg for DBP relative to reference values derived from a visual method of determining SBP and DBP. The proposed RNN-based approach uses all time-domain features available from each NIBP recording and can outperform traditional methods in blood pressure (BP) estimation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Argha et al. (2019) studied Blood pressure estimation (n=350). LSTM-RNN approach for blood pressure estimation vs. Reference values derived from a visual method was evaluated on Average mean error for SBP and DBP (average mean error of -1.2 ± 5.9 mmHg for SBP and 1.8 ± 8.8 mmHg for DBP). An LSTM-RNN approach for estimating blood pressure from oscillometric waveforms yielded an average mean error of -1.2 ± 5.9 mmHg for SBP and 1.8 ± 8.8 mmHg for DBP compared to a visual reference method.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: